TinBoats.net
The original aluminum boat site!
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Blog
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off The Water
Watering Hole
Tubby Tubby Weight loss challenge 2011
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support TinBoats.net:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="richg99" data-source="post: 196117" data-attributes="member: 4376"><p>We all just need these new "weight-loss" pants.....Rich</p><p>****************************************************************</p><p>https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17sitting-t.html</p><p></p><p></p><p>Excerpt....</p><p>Dr. Levine then began to ply them with an extra 1,000 calories per day.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"> Sure enough, some of his subjects packed on the pounds, while others gained little to no weight.</span></p><p></p><p>“We measured everything, thinking we were going to find some magic metabolic factor that would explain why some people didn’t gain weight,” explains Dr. Michael Jensen, a Mayo Clinic researcher who collaborated with Dr. Levine on the studies. But that wasn’t the case. Then six years later, with the help of the motion-tracking underwear, they discovered the answer. “The people who didn’t gain weight were unconsciously moving around more,” Dr. Jensen says. They hadn’t started exercising more — that was prohibited by the study. Their bodies simply responded naturally by making more little movements than they had before the overfeeding began, like taking the stairs, trotting down the hall to the office water cooler, bustling about with chores at home or simply fidgeting. On average, the subjects who gained weight sat two hours more per day than those who hadn’t.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="richg99, post: 196117, member: 4376"] We all just need these new "weight-loss" pants.....Rich **************************************************************** https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17sitting-t.html Excerpt.... Dr. Levine then began to ply them with an extra 1,000 calories per day. [size=5] Sure enough, some of his subjects packed on the pounds, while others gained little to no weight.[/size] “We measured everything, thinking we were going to find some magic metabolic factor that would explain why some people didn’t gain weight,” explains Dr. Michael Jensen, a Mayo Clinic researcher who collaborated with Dr. Levine on the studies. But that wasn’t the case. Then six years later, with the help of the motion-tracking underwear, they discovered the answer. “The people who didn’t gain weight were unconsciously moving around more,” Dr. Jensen says. They hadn’t started exercising more — that was prohibited by the study. Their bodies simply responded naturally by making more little movements than they had before the overfeeding began, like taking the stairs, trotting down the hall to the office water cooler, bustling about with chores at home or simply fidgeting. On average, the subjects who gained weight sat two hours more per day than those who hadn’t. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off The Water
Watering Hole
Tubby Tubby Weight loss challenge 2011
Top